“Deduction,” “induction,” and “abduction” are philosophical methods of reasoning, each with its own characteristics and applications. These methods can be applied both in theoretical frameworks and conceptual frameworks in various fields, including business and entrepreneurship.




Integration with Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks:

In summary, deduction, induction, and abduction are distinct forms of reasoning that can be applied both in theoretical frameworks, where they contribute to hypothesis testing and theory generation, and in conceptual frameworks, where they aid in the development of explanatory frameworks or models. Their application depends on the specific research context and objectives.

Also, from another source:

Deduction, induction, and abduction are all reasoning methods, but they differ in their approach to knowledge:

Here’s a table summarizing the key differences:

Starting PointGeneral principlesSpecific observations
AimLogical certaintyDevelop hypotheses
Framework AssociationTheoretical frameworksConceptual frameworks

Abduction is a bit different. It’s sometimes called “inference to the best explanation.” It involves observing a phenomenon and then proposing a possible explanation, even though there could be other explanations.

Example: “My car won’t start. The battery is dead. Therefore, I need to jump-start it.” Here, the dead battery is the best explanation for the observed phenomenon (car not starting), but there could be other reasons (e.g., out of gas). Abduction can be used in both theoretical and conceptual frameworks, depending on the research stage.

Here are some additional points to consider:

By understanding these reasoning methods and framework types, you can choose the best approach for your research question and create a strong foundation for your business or entrepreneurial endeavors.