The philosophical differences between Eastern and Western traditions are numerous and nuanced, reflecting distinct cultural, historical, and religious contexts. While there can be overlaps and intersections, some key points of contention include:

1. Metaphysics and Ontology: Eastern philosophies, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism, often emphasize the interconnectedness of all things and the impermanent nature of reality. Concepts like karma, rebirth, and the interconnectedness of life are central. In contrast, Western philosophies, particularly those stemming from ancient Greek thought, focus more on the distinction between being and becoming, the nature of being, and the pursuit of objective truth.
2. Epistemology: Eastern philosophies tend to prioritize direct experience, intuition, and contemplative practices as means of acquiring knowledge. For instance, in Zen Buddhism, direct realization through meditation is valued. Meanwhile, Western traditions have historically leaned towards rationalism and empiricism, emphasizing logic, reason, and empirical observation as paths to knowledge.
3. Ethics and Morality: While both Eastern and Western philosophies address questions of ethics and morality, they often approach them from different perspectives. For example, Western ethics may be more rule-based or grounded in theories like utilitarianism or deontology, whereas Eastern ethics might emphasize virtues, harmony, and the cultivation of moral character.
4. Individual vs. Collective: There’s often a distinction in emphasis between individualism and collectivism. Western philosophy, particularly in its modern iterations, often places a strong emphasis on individual rights, autonomy, and freedom. In contrast, many Eastern philosophies place greater importance on the community, social harmony, and the interconnectedness of individuals with society.
5. Time and Change: Eastern philosophies often view time and change as cyclical or fluid, emphasizing processes of growth, decay, and renewal. In contrast, Western philosophies, particularly influenced by Judeo-Christian traditions, may have a linear view of time, with a distinct beginning and end, and a teleological understanding of history.
6. Nature of the Self: Eastern philosophies often challenge the Western notion of a fixed, enduring self. Instead, they may posit a more fluid, interconnected understanding of the self, sometimes even suggesting that the self is an illusion to be transcended. This contrasts with Western philosophies that often emphasize the individual self as the locus of identity and agency.
7. Approach to Reality: Eastern philosophies tend to adopt a more holistic and intuitive approach to reality, often seeking to dissolve dualities and conceptual distinctions. Western philosophies, on the other hand, frequently employ analytical and reductionist methods to understand reality, seeking to dissect and categorize phenomena.

These points, while highlighting some general differences, also reflect the diversity within each tradition and the ongoing dialogue and exchange that occurs between Eastern and Western philosophical thought.

The phrase “never the twain shall meet” originates from Rudyard Kipling’s poem “The Ballad of East and West,” published in 1889. The full line is: “Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet.”

This phrase has been widely interpreted to suggest the irreconcilable differences between Eastern and Western cultures, including their philosophies, worldviews, and ways of life. It implies that the gap between these two perspectives is so vast and fundamental that they can never truly understand or reconcile with each other.

However, while there are certainly significant differences between Eastern and Western thought, it’s important to recognize that this phrase doesn’t reflect an absolute truth. In reality, there has been significant exchange, interaction, and cross-pollination between Eastern and Western cultures throughout history.

In recent times, globalization, advancements in communication and transportation, and increased scholarly interest in comparative philosophy have facilitated greater dialogue and understanding between Eastern and Western traditions. While differences remain, there are also areas of convergence and mutual enrichment. Therefore, while the phrase captures a historical sentiment, it doesn’t accurately represent the current state of cultural and philosophical exchange.

Also, from another source:

The differences between Eastern and Western philosophical traditions have long been a point of contention and debate. Here are some of the key areas where major philosophical differences emerge:

1. Nature of Reality: Western philosophy, influenced by ancient Greek thinkers, tends to view reality as objective and independent of the observer. Eastern philosophies, particularly those rooted in Hinduism and Buddhism, often consider reality to be more subjective and interconnected.
2. Individual vs. Collective: Western thought places a strong emphasis on individualism, personal autonomy, and individual rights. Eastern philosophies, particularly Confucianism and some Buddhist schools, tend to prioritize the collective good, social harmony, and the individual’s role within a larger whole.
3. Approach to Knowledge: Western philosophy generally relies on logical reasoning, empirical observation, and the scientific method to acquire knowledge. Many Eastern philosophies, such as Taoism and certain Buddhist traditions, embrace intuition, meditation, and personal experiential insights as valid paths to understanding.
4. View of the Self: In Western thought, the self is often seen as a distinct, enduring entity separate from the physical world. Eastern philosophies, especially Buddhism, challenge the notion of a permanent, independent self and view the self as a constantly changing process.
5. Relationship with Nature: Western philosophy has historically viewed humans as separate from and often dominating over nature. Eastern philosophies, like Taoism and certain schools of Hinduism, emphasize living in harmony with nature and respecting the natural order.
6. Concept of Time: Western philosophy generally perceives time as linear, with a clear past, present, and future. Some Eastern philosophies, such as certain Buddhist and Hindu traditions, view time as cyclical or even illusory.
7. Approach to Spirituality: While Western philosophy has largely separated reason from spirituality, many Eastern philosophies integrate spiritual concepts and practices into their philosophical systems, viewing them as complementary paths to understanding.

These philosophical differences have led to ongoing debates and exchanges between Eastern and Western thinkers, often challenging each tradition’s assumptions and prompting critical reflection on fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, and human nature.

Also, from another source:

Here’s a breakdown of some core philosophical differences between Eastern and Western traditions, along with potential points of contention within these discussions:

Key Areas of Difference

• The Self vs. The Whole:
  • East: Tends to see the self as deeply interconnected with the cosmos and larger society. Individuality is often understood as a role within a broader web of relationships and duties. The goal is often achieving harmony with this larger reality.
  • West: Prioritizes the individual. Self-discovery and realization are often central aims, along with concepts of personal autonomy and rights.
• Logic and Rationality vs. Intuition and Experience:
  • East: Many Eastern schools value direct experience, intuition, and meditation. Logic can play a role, but it’s often subservient to achieving transcendent states of consciousness and understanding.
  • West: Heavy emphasis on logical systems and rational arguments as the basis for knowledge. The scientific method and analysis hold strong influence.
• The Nature of Reality:
  • East: Embraces concepts like non-duality (the world is ultimately one), impermanence, and interconnectedness. The phenomenal world might be seen as illusory or less important than the underlying reality.
  • West Traditionally focused on defining a knowable, external reality. There is a tendency towards materialism (physical matter is the primary reality) or a clearer division between mind and world.
• Ethics and Morality
  • East: Often focused on duty, virtue, cultivating inner states of being, and finding balance and harmony. Karma and the law of cause and effect can be central.
  • West: Concerned with codifying rules, rights, and abstract moral systems (e.g., Kantian ethics, utilitarianism). Individual responsibility carries more weight.

Points of Contention

• Oversimplification: It’s easy to paint Western and Eastern philosophies with broad strokes, ignoring the vast diversity and evolution within both traditions. These categories are generalizations, and both areas hold complex, nuanced worldviews.
• Superiority Arguments: There’s a historical tendency on both sides to claim a more “correct” or “practical” approach. This overlooks the potential value of finding complementary aspects between the two.
• Cross-Pollination: Due to globalization and historical exchange, the lines between “East” and “West” have been blurring for centuries. Many thinkers are deliberately drawing on both traditions, making the lines less clear.
• Appropriation vs Appreciation: Taking elements of Eastern philosophies (like mindfulness) out of context for Western aims can be viewed as exploitative rather than true understanding.