The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is an investment theory that suggests that financial markets are “efficient” in reflecting all available information. According to EMH, it’s impossible to consistently achieve higher returns than the average market performance on a risk-adjusted basis, as prices already incorporate and reflect all relevant information.
Key Points of EMH:
- Price Accuracy: Asset prices always reflect all publicly available information.
- Unpredictability: Future price movements are random and cannot be predicted consistently.
- Investor Behavior: No individual or group of investors can consistently outperform the market unless they take on additional risk or benefit from luck.
Forms of EMH:
EMH is divided into three levels based on the type of information incorporated into asset prices:
- Weak Form:
- Prices reflect all historical market data, such as past prices and volume.
- Technical analysis is ineffective in predicting future price movements.
- Semi-Strong Form:
- Prices incorporate all publicly available information, including financial statements, news, and economic data.
- Both technical and fundamental analysis are unlikely to provide consistent advantages.
- Strong Form:
- Prices reflect all information, both public and private (e.g., insider information).
- No investor can outperform the market even with access to insider knowledge.
Criticisms of EMH:
- Behavioral Finance: Critics argue that markets are not always rational, as human emotions and biases (e.g., overconfidence, fear, greed) influence investor behavior.
- Market Anomalies: Events like bubbles, crashes, and patterns (e.g., momentum or value investing success) challenge the idea of perfect efficiency.
- Empirical Evidence: Studies have shown that some investors, like Warren Buffett, have consistently outperformed the market, suggesting inefficiencies.
Practical Implications:
- For Investors: EMH implies that passive investing (e.g., using index funds) is a better strategy than active stock picking or market timing.
- For Markets: The hypothesis assumes that arbitrage opportunities are short-lived, as market participants quickly act on discrepancies.
