A contradiction matrix is often used in problem-solving methodologies like TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), primarily to address conflicting requirements in design or engineering processes. When developing or improving a system, contradictory requirements may arise, for example, improving a product’s durability might increase its weight, which may be undesirable.
Contents
How a Contradiction Matrix Works
In the context of TRIZ, a contradiction matrix provides a structured way to resolve these conflicts by:
- Listing Parameters: It identifies pairs of contradictory parameters in a system. TRIZ uses 39 standard parameters, such as weight, strength, speed, reliability, etc.
- Mapping Solutions: For each pair of conflicting parameters, the matrix suggests inventive principles (from 40 standard principles in TRIZ) that can resolve the conflict.
- Guiding Problem Solvers: By cross-referencing the two conflicting parameters in the matrix, problem solvers can find suggested principles or strategies to try that might balance or overcome the contradiction.
Example Structure of a TRIZ Contradiction Matrix
Imagine a row and column list of the 39 parameters. The cell where the two parameters intersect indicates potential principles to apply. For instance, if “Strength” and “Weight” intersect, principles like “Segmentation” or “Asymmetry” might be suggested to help reduce weight without compromising strength.
Applications of a Contradiction Matrix
- Engineering and Product Design: Optimize designs to balance strength, weight, durability, and cost.
- Software Development: Resolve conflicting requirements like speed vs. data accuracy.
- Business Strategy: Balance growth and operational stability.
This matrix is especially powerful because it suggests creative, non-obvious solutions by encouraging you to explore principles that have solved similar issues in other contexts.